Friday, January 18, 2008
-
Wall Street Journal Article on Church Shunnings
Banned From Church
Reviving an ancient practice, churches are exposing sinners and shunning those who won't repent.By ALEXANDRA ALTER
January 18, 2008; Page W1On a quiet Sunday morning in June, as worshippers settled into the pews at Allen Baptist Church in southwestern Michigan, Pastor Jason Burrick grabbed his cellphone and dialed 911. When a dispatcher answered, the preacher said a former congregant was in the sanctuary. "And we need to, um, have her out A.S.A.P."
Half an hour later, 71-year-old Karolyn Caskey, a church member for nearly 50 years who had taught Sunday school and regularly donated 10% of her pension, was led out by a state trooper and a county sheriff's officer. One held her purse and Bible. The other put her in handcuffs. (Listen to the 911 call)
The charge was trespassing, but Mrs. Caskey's real offense, in her pastor's view, was spiritual. Several months earlier, when she had questioned his authority, he'd charged her with spreading "a spirit of cancer and discord" and expelled her from the congregation. "I've been shunned," she says.
Her story reflects a growing movement among some conservative Protestant pastors to bring back church discipline, an ancient practice in which suspected sinners are privately confronted and then publicly castigated and excommunicated if they refuse to repent. While many Christians find such practices outdated, pastors in large and small churches across the country are expelling members for offenses ranging from adultery and theft to gossiping, skipping service and criticizing church leaders.
PODCASTS![[Church]](http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-AX912_shun_p_20080117150052.jpg)
Dave Krieger/Getty Images * * *• Hear an interview with Doug Laycock, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Michigan, about the legal implications of church discipline.• Hear the 911 call made by Pastor Burrick.CAST OFF• Timeline: View a brief history of shunning and excommunication.The revival is part of a broader movement to restore churches to their traditional role as moral enforcers, Christian leaders say. Some say that contemporary churches have grown soft on sinners, citing the rise of suburban megachurches where pastors preach self-affirming messages rather than focusing on sin and redemption. Others point to a passage in the gospel of Matthew that says unrepentant sinners must be shunned.
Causing Disharmony
Watermark Community Church, a nondenominational church in Dallas that draws 4,000 people to services, requires members to sign a form stating they will submit to the "care and correction" of church elders. Last week, the pastor of a 6,000-member megachurch in Nashville, Tenn., threatened to expel 74 members for gossiping and causing disharmony unless they repented. The congregants had sued the pastor for access to the church's financial records.
First Baptist Church of Muscle Shoals, Ala., a 1,000-member congregation, expels five to seven members a year for "blatant, undeniable patterns of willful sin," which have included adultery, drunkenness and refusal to honor church elders. About 400 people have left the church over the years for what they view as an overly harsh persecution of sinners, Pastor Jeff Noblit says.
The process can be messy, says Al Jackson, pastor of Lakeview Baptist Church in Auburn, Ala., which began disciplining members in the 1990s. Once, when the congregation voted out an adulterer who refused to repent, an older woman was confused and thought the church had voted to send the man to hell.
![[Shun]](http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/WK-AK836_SHUN_j_20080117183042.jpg)
Karolyn Caskey was expelled from Allen Baptist Church after clashing with the pastor. Amy Hitt, 43, a mortgage officer in Amissville, Va., was voted out of her Baptist congregation in 2004 for gossiping about her pastor's plans to buy a bigger house. Her ouster was especially hard on her twin sons, now 12 years old, who had made friends in the church, she says. "Some people have looked past it, but then there are others who haven't," says Ms. Hitt, who believes the episode cost her a seat on the school board last year; she lost by 42 votes.
Scholars estimate that 10% to 15% of Protestant evangelical churches practice church discipline -- about 14,000 to 21,000 U.S. congregations in total. Increasingly, clashes within churches are spilling into communities, splitting congregations and occasionally landing church leaders in court after congregants, who believed they were confessing in private, were publicly shamed.
In the past decade, more than two dozen lawsuits related to church discipline have been filed as congregants sue pastors for defamation, negligent counseling and emotional injury, according to the Religion Case Reporter, a legal-research database. Peggy Penley, a Fort Worth, Texas, woman whose pastor revealed her extramarital affair to the congregation after she confessed it in confidence, waged a six-year battle against the pastor, charging him with negligence. Last summer, the Texas Supreme Court dismissed her suit, ruling that the pastor was exercising his religious beliefs by publicizing the affair.
![[Shun]](http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/WK-AK837_SHUN_j_20080117183040.jpg)
Allen Baptist Church Courts have often refused to hear such cases on the grounds that churches are protected by the constitutional right to free religious exercise, but some have sided with alleged sinners. In 2003, a woman and her husband won a defamation suit against the Iowa Methodist conference and its superintendent after he publicly accused her of "spreading the spirit of Satan" because she gossiped about her pastor. A district court rejected the case, but the Iowa Supreme Court upheld the woman's appeal on the grounds that the letter labeling her a sinner was circulated beyond the church.
Advocates of shunning say it rarely leads to the public disclosure of a member's sin. "We're not the FBI; we're not sniffing around people's homes trying to find out some secret sin," says Don Singleton, pastor of Ridgeview Baptist Church in Talladega, Ala., who says the 50-member church has disciplined six members in his 2½ years as pastor. "Ninety-nine percent of these cases never go that far."
When they do, it can be humiliating. A devout Christian and grandmother of three, Mrs. Caskey moves with a halting gait, due to two artificial knees and a double hip replacement. Friends and family describe her as a generous woman who helped pay the electricity bill for Allen Baptist, in Allen, Mich., when funds were low, gave the church $1,200 after she sold her van, and even cut the church's lawn on occasion. She has requested an engraved image of the church on her tombstone.
Gossip and Slander
Her expulsion came as a shock to some church members when, in August 2006, the pastor sent a letter to the congregation stating Mrs. Caskey and an older married couple, Patsy and Emmit Church, had been removed for taking "action against the church and your preacher." The pastor, Mr. Burrick, told congregants the three were guilty of gossip, slander and idolatry and should be shunned, according to several former church members.
"People couldn't believe it," says Janet Biggs, 53, a former church member who quit the congregation in protest.
The conflict had been brewing for months. Shortly after the church hired Mr. Burrick in 2005 to help revive the congregation, which had dwindled to 12 members, Mrs. Caskey asked him to appoint a board of deacons to help govern the church, a tradition outlined in the church's charter. Mr. Burrick said the congregation was too small to warrant deacons. Mrs. Caskey pressed the issue at the church's quarterly business meetings and began complaining that Mr. Burrick was not following the church's bylaws. "She's one of the nicest, kindest people I know," says friend and neighbor Robert Johnston, 69, a retired cabinet maker. "But she won't be pushed around."
![[Shun]](http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/WK-AK838_SHUN_j_20080117183102.jpg)
Karolyn Caskey reads her Bible. In April 2006, Mrs. Caskey received a stern letter from Mr. Burrick. "This church will not tolerate this spirit of cancer and discord that you would like to spread," it said. Mrs. Caskey, along with Mr. and Mrs. Church, continued to insist that the pastor follow the church's constitution. In August, she received a letter from Mr. Burrick that said her failure to repent had led to her removal. It also said he would not write her a transfer letter enabling her to join another church, a requirement in many Baptist congregations, until she had "made things right here at Allen Baptist."
She went to Florida for the winter, and when she returned to Michigan last June, she drove the two miles to Allen Baptist as usual. A church member asked her to leave, saying she was not welcome, but Mrs. Caskey told him she had come to worship and asked if they could speak after the service. Twenty minutes into the service, a sheriff's officer was at her side, and an hour later, she was in jail.
"It was very humiliating," says Mrs. Caskey, who worked for the state of Michigan for 25 years before retiring from the Department of Corrections in 1992. "The other prisoners were surprised to see a little old lady in her church clothes. One of them said, 'You robbed a church?' and I said, 'No, I just attended church.' "
Word quickly spread throughout Allen, a close-knit town of about 200 residents. Once a thriving community of farmers and factory workers, Allen consists of little more than a strip of dusty antiques stores. Mr. and Mrs. Church, both in their 70s, eventually joined another Baptist congregation nearby.
About 25 people stopped attending Allen Baptist Church after Mrs. Caskey was shunned, according to several former church members.
Current members say they support the pastor's actions, and they note that the congregation has grown under his leadership. The simple, white-washed building now draws around 70 people on Sunday mornings, many of them young families. "He's a very good leader; he has total respect for the people," says Stephen Johnson, 66, an auto parts inspector, who added that Mr. Burrick was right to remove Mrs. Caskey because "the Bible says causing discord in the church is an abomination."
Mrs. Caskey went back to the church about a month after her arrest, shortly after the county prosecutor threw out the trespassing charge. More than a dozen supporters gathered outside, some with signs that read "What Would Jesus Do?" She sat in the front row as Mr. Burrick preached about "infidels in the pews," according to reports from those present.
Once again, Mrs. Caskey was escorted out by a state trooper and taken to jail, where she posted the $62 bail and was released. After that, the county prosecutor dismissed the charge and told county law enforcement not to arrest her again unless she was creating a disturbance.
In the following weeks, Mrs. Caskey continued to worship at Allen Baptist. Some congregants no longer spoke to her or passed the offering plate, and some changed seats if she sat next to them, she says.
Mr. Burrick repeatedly declined to comment on Mrs. Caskey's case, calling it a "private ecclesiastical matter." He did say that while the church does not "blacklist" anyone, a strict reading of the Bible requires pastors to punish disobedient members. "A lot of times, flocks aren't willing to submit or be obedient to God," he said in an interview before a Sunday evening service. "If somebody is not willing to be helped, they forfeit their membership."
In Christianity's early centuries, church discipline led sinners to cover themselves with ashes or spend time in the stocks. In later centuries, expulsion was more common. Until the late 19th century, shunning was widely practiced by American evangelicals, including Methodists, Presbyterians and Baptists. Today, excommunication rarely occurs in the U.S. Catholic Church, and shunning is largely unheard of among mainline Protestants.
Little Consensus
Among churches that practice discipline, there is little consensus on how sinners should be dealt with, says Gregory Wills, a theologian at Southern Baptist Theological seminary. Some pastors remove members on their own, while other churches require agreement among deacons or a majority vote from the congregation.
Since Mrs. Caskey's second arrest last July, the turmoil at Allen Baptist has fizzled into an awkward stalemate. Allen Baptist is an independent congregation, unaffiliated with a church hierarchy that might review the ouster. Supporters have urged Mrs. Caskey to sue to have her membership restored, but she says the matter should be settled in the church. Mr. Burrick no longer calls the police when Mrs. Caskey shows up for Sunday services.
Since November, Mrs. Caskey has been attending a Baptist church near her winter home in Tavares, Fla. She plans to go back to Allen Baptist when she returns to Michigan this spring.
"I don't intend to abandon that church," Mrs. Caskey says. "I feel like I have every right to be there."
Write to Alexandra Alter at alexandra.alter@wsj.com

Comments (18)
Wow.
How much can be said about all of THAT?! That hits very close to home both in my personal experience and geographically,
I'll make one general observation about fundamentalism in the church. It tends to bow up and flex when it's under a lot of perceived persecution from society. There are several social elements challenging it right now, but I'll just name a few. One is the rushing advance of science. Empirical evidence is seriously challenging literal interpretations of scripture on things of nature/creation. Another is cultural role shifts, such as a single, monogamous marriage becoming an shrinking cornerstone of the 'typical" family and women's roles in leadership darn near everywhere except fundamental churches. Another is the politics of playing "moral" issues in front of the conservative right, generating fear that the world is going to hell in a hand basket. And one more is the shrinking attendance of people attending denominational, structured church regularly.
Change is afoot. One thing fundamentalist (of any variety) hate is change.
I'm torn. I've seen this from both sides. On the one hand I've been unfairly booted out of at least one church on completely absurd and trumped-up charges because (it was obvious even at the time) some people decided they just didn't like me and were in a position where they could do something about it. On the other hand, I've been in church leadership myself and seen what happens when there's no way to deal with, say, people who are constantly critical. (Business meetings from Gehenna, that's what.)
The dilemma, it seems to me, is that if you don't have any church discipline, some jerk in the pews will come along and spoil things for everyone. But if you do have church discipline, some jerk in the leadership will come along and spoil things for everyone. Heads the jerks win, tails the rest of us lose.
Maybe I'm just rambling, or maybe I'm just overly cynical. I think what I want to know is, how do we keep the jerks from winning without in the process becoming jerks ourselves?
You know, I liked what John "uprisingyouth" had to say in his comment on your post before this one. John's last line was the best; "The principle is correction vs. condemnation. When I correct my daughter it is normally in private and for her good because I love her and want the best for her, I am just guiding." That is exactly the way the Church should approach discipline; in love for God, the body, and the person being corrected. Let's face it we are broken people being conformed to the image and likeness of Christ. There will be times we need correction.
I have needed and been corrected by leaders. I've never needed a lot, but I am grateful for every leader in the church who gave loving correction. I've seen bad leadership. I mean come on, a 70 something lady is kicked out of church because she thinks there should be deacons??? Why would a leader in the church not want others to serve with him/her??? Were I a pastor I'd want people working with me to hold me accountable. As a leader I loved and appreciated my fellow leaders.
The key is balance; holding everyone, including leadership, to God's standard; and when correction is called for it is done in love, with a servant's attitude, and in complete confidence. Everything should be done to keep errant folks in the flock. If a person forces the leadership to ask him/her to leave then it should be clear that the arms and hearts of the Church are always open. Then let it drop. All of this ugly, mean hearted, manipulation is just ungodly. We should be heartbroken if a brother/sister chooses life destroying sin over God's righteous standard. (Notice please that I said God's standard not man's standard).
Good Stuff Mrs. D
Lonnie
A church that doesn't follow it's own rules (it's constitution and by laws in the case you cited) is completely wrong to expel and shun anyone who insists on the either obeying the rules or changing them. From what I can glean from the article, it appears that this fundie pastor has become a dictator.
But like others here, I have seen far worse results from the neglect of church discipline than from its exercise. A church that doesn't practice discipline is not a true church! But the way it is practiced in most churches that actually attempt to practice it is all too often archaic and abusive. Someone needs to write a book on how modern church discipline should be practiced. It is meant to be redemptive and restorative. Punishment is different. Punishment seeks justice. Discipline, however, seeks mercy and redemption. There should be no such thing as church punishment.
-Robin
Robin, I can't agree with you about which is worse, but this is just my limited experience. You are right that we need to completely re-think what discipline is and how it should be used, though. I am convinced we really have no idea what we're doing--none of us. Until we truly understand the powerfully inclusive nature of the Gospel, I think all of us will be tempted to use church discipline to run other peoples' lives, rather than to preserve the integrity and public witness of the church. The idea I get about excommunication in the New Testament is for people who are wildy, flagrantly disgracing the church and bringing ridicule to it, not for normal everyday sinners. Note the one detailed instruction for excommunication we have in I Cor 5 is about someone who is doing something even the pagans are shocked at. You don't think in a city like Corinth there weren't people with all kinds of imperfections and failings? Paul didn't say put them out.
Brett, wow, you really have an unencumbered perspective on these things! I think your comment would be a great outline for a Master's thesis on the sociology of the church. We have come to the same conclusion as you--that in these many individual cases of over-reach from church leaders, what is really going on is the church leader is fighting the culture battle, one person at a time. They see the changing society and hate it and so if one particular church member's marriage is falling apart, for instance, they lose sight of the real people involved and just see the culture war and are determined that there's not going to be a divorce on their watch, (or an illegitimate pregnancy or homosexuality or a woman head-of-house, or whatever.)
But the fact is, IMO, that society is changing, as it always has and always will (and always should, let's face it), and you can't retrofit members of this new society back into the old one, or what's worse, into an imaginary ideal society without doing violence to them. You have to take into account a person's whole life, culture and circumstances. And if you really invest yourself open-mindedly in someone else enough to try to understand what's best for them, and if you're honest about it, you'll realize that you can't understand someone else's life well enough to rule it. You can guide and advise, maybe (if you've done your homework and really invested yourself in the person), but ruling them and dictating their personal decisions--that's beyond any of us. I don't think that's what church discipline is for.
Wow. That is just amazing. The thing that is most ironic is that all the woman was doing was trying to follow established (proper) protocol. That pastor is not to be trusted if he was unwilling to make himself accoutnable by having a deacon board, imo.
I also am totally amazed that police would even answer a call like that. How can it be called trespassing? A church is a public building, is it not? And anyone who would throw someone out of a worship service definitely cannot be called a pastor (or even a Christian, for that matter.) Discipline does NOT include not allowing someone to hear the gospel preached!
There may be valid reasons for revoking church membership, but I don't think questioning leadership is one of them. There is a world of difference between open sin without repentance and attempting to keep church leaders accountable!
And even if membership is revoked, to ban someone from the church service is positively wrong!
Incredible that anyone is left in the congregation at all. It's scary, in fact.
1 Cor 5, Paul did say not to associate with them. At least not as a fellow believer. So you would end up treating them as an unbeliever. Which would not be calling the local authorites to remove them. That's ludicrous. I feel especially bad for the lady. Part of her problem is that she needs to let go. But that is her thing to deal with. The church has gotten plenty of attention for what it is doing. Thanks to her continued efforts, but she needs to go somewhere and be fed. Lest she starve.
Eric is right on. There are two sides to this. The sad thing is, church leaders can be just as abused as members. And though leaders have more responsibility, I've heard of places where there are some behind the scenes who wield more power than the pastor. And it takes a strong pastor to overcome that as well.
If I lived near that town, I would pay that church a visit. Sit quietly and listen to the message from the 'pastor' and then fellowship afterwards and talk about the Bible and reconciliation and that is what Jesus and all His followers were about. And wonder out loud if the pastor would like some help reading the scriptures. Second thought, it would probably be better not to go. Just talk to people in their lives and point out what a good church would do. I hope she finds a good healthy non-fundamentalist church.
Pass_the_Aura: who the heck knows, huh? If those business meetings from Gehenna are anything like some board meetings I know, it seems hopeless. You can't just fire your board and you can't just boot out trouble-makers. The fact is, leaders are under authority just like everybody else and have to respect that authority, and sometimes it means putting up with very difficult members. I would guess that diplomacy is a beseiged leader's last best hope. Just remember this--a troublesome church member can cause you grief and be a constant plague, but an abusive church leader can do worse--they can seriously mess with your relationship with God. To whom much is given, much is required.
Which brings me to another point that homefire brought up--I think abuses of leadership always involve the leader flaunting the authority he himself is under. They feel that the rules don't apply to them, or that they understand the situation well enough to set aside the rules, or that they know better and should do things their own way. Rules can be very troublesome--bureaucratic, tedious, and they slow things down. They can mean that a church member is allowed to 'get away with something'. But if there is a lack of conscience or poor understanding in a leader, or if there is arrogance, rules are the only things keeping them from misusing the very significant authority they have. Rules for leaders protect the rest of us. If you see a leader setting aside a rule, even a little rule like the number of deacons their constitution requires or some matter of protocol they are bound to, you can know you are dealing with a tyrrant--somebody who thinks they are above authority. If they will blow past a small rule, you have no guarantee they will yield to the bigger rules if they are tempted beyond the limits of their character.
unbelievable!!!! i'm angry!!!
You know Mrs. D I was thinking of something my pastor in SC said once. He'd been studying sheep and shepherding, to understand better God's usage of shepherding. He said he'd learned that a shepherd will go before the sheep leading them to pasture or water. But when sheep are going to the butcher, the shepherd stands behind and drives the flock to destruction.
Something to think about.
Lonnie
Ahh, that quest to exert power over someone else. It is everywhere, it is tempting, and like pass-the-aura says, it is the jerks who abuse the power, whether they are jerks in the pew or jerks on the pulpit.
God keep us from being jerks when we are handed power, and may we also be kept from being jerks when we are not the ones with the power.
It is so easy to be a jerk.
Iamherenow123, that's a great prayer. We're all too much in danger of jerkitude.
Lonnie, great little proverb, there!
Homemaker, I am angry, too, and I'm not even godly!
power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. I think that pretty much says it all.
wonder what would happen if this church WAS a part of an affiliation?
i agree with correction, but correction without love is abuse.
Correction is meant to bring the one in need of it back into fellowship, not drive them away permanently. Good thoughts, Ehrinn. Which makes it obvious that the pastor in that church isn't about doing what Jesus wanted. He isn't trying to connect, but punish.
Robin said, "A church that doesn't follow it's own rules (it's constitution and by laws in the case you cited) is completely wrong to expel and shun anyone who insists on the either obeying the rules or changing them."
The last two churches I held office in disregarded both their own constituion and the laws of the state (they were both non-profit corporations with and 501 c 3 ). Their cavalier does as they will because they are a church (or a pastor or a elder) and the state wont tell them what to do reminds me of spoiled brats who call people names from behind barriers or cling onto home base.
Of course, I am always "the ass" when I suggest if you dont want to abide by state law, give up your non-profit corporation status or 501 c 3 status or confrom to the rules which YOU PUT YOURSELFS UNDER to gain a advantage (being held harmless in incorporation or tax exemption) Self accountability is a concept that is frowned on today in many "churches.". Disorder in the offices is a sure way to kill the church-poison the sheep.
It seems the main thing lacking here in this story, is relationship. Relationship seems to have gone by the wayside for the sake of 'correctness'.
Surely relationship is the key to modern church discipline. Authentic relationship with each other and with leadership.
It breaks my heart to read this kind of thing, yet as a mother I also know the benefits of discipline carried out within the safe and authentic realms of healthy relationship.
I have really appreciated reading your blogs.
@sarahsD - Thanks, Sarah. I agree so much about relationships. What seems to be happening in this current age of legalism is that we've become so obsessed witht the culture war that we've lost sight of the real people in front of us who are taking the hits. Instead of seeing a guy with gender identity struggles, we see the 'gay agenda.' Instead of seeing two heartbroken people with a collapsing marriage, we see 'the breakdown of marriage in America.' And so we end up hurting the real people in front of us in order to try to save some abstract thing like family values.