Wednesday, April 09, 2008
-
From Avarice to Abnegation...Intentional Community Style

Currently Reading
Castrating Culture: A Christian Perspective on Ethnic Identity from the Margins
By Dawi Hughes
see related
My wife and I are joining/starting an intentional community of mutual sharing and responsibility. We will be moving in on April 26.Here are some thoughts I've had during this process...
One of the great doctrines of ancient Church lies in their teaching that death cannot separate the ekkelesia of God from itself. Indeed, this is one of the great doctrines of Pauline theology if we read Ephesians carefully enough. Death cannot alienate us either from the love of God or from fellowship of one another. The church, the community of Christ, is so solidified, so fused together, and so intertwined that the feeble attempts of our “final enemy” to rupture our bonds of faith are fated to failure.
Oh, but what death could not accomplish American individualism has achieved. The same church Paul commands to be “united in Spirit” and “contending as one soul for the faith of the gospel” has been torn asunder like the pitied girl whose corpse was cut in 12 chunks and mailed to each of Israel’s most powerful mob families. Individualism’s insipid doctrine of self-autonomy and self-betterment have all but made the church a privatized social club calling for no accountability and possessing no prophetic voice. And when you have a group of self-oriented people attempting to do life together, factions and schism are inevitable – it’s like sticking a bunch of 2 year olds in a sandbox together; it’s not going to be long before it becomes a human litter box despite the protests of those who know better.
From where does this individualism emerge? Surely not form within the biblical text with its persistent call for communal unity. And surely not from church tradition which stresses that there is no salvation apart from the church community – that is, one cannot claim to be a Christian and not participate in the redeemed community.
But it would be too premature a jump for me to say that it arises out of some secular-liberal agenda clandestinely subverting the church and its "Christian" culture. In fact, this would be the easy answer wouldn’t it? After all, aren’t those “leftists” to blame for all our problems? It certainly couldn’t be that we’ve swallowed our own red pill, could it?
Sociologist Max Weber actually traces American individualism back to….wait for it….Protestantism (specifically it’s early American Puritan version). In The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism ,Weber argues that the Calvinistic theology of early American Protestantism focused largely on individual election and the signs thereof. That "God has predestined me, personally, to eternal salvation is manifested in the fact that he has prospered me with material gain” was the thought of the hour, and has stayed around long after Puritanism died under the weight of its own self-righteousness.
For me, this assumption is largely what our little community will challenge. I want my materialistic, self-focused Christianity to be defenestrated like a bad grade card on the bus ride home from school. I want to proceed from avarice to abnegation and learn to think of others more highly than I do myself. I want to learn to blame myself first for community conflict instead of assuming others are always asinine. I want to purge the materialistic, privatized, self-absorbed religiosity from my soul, that somehow I might know Christ and the power of his resurrection in a more meaningful way. I want to confront and be confronted with sin. I want to lay my soul bare before others so that there remains no crevice left for falsehood to fester.
Dear God, I must be insane…
Post a Comment
- Back to TheFuerstShallBeLast's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in TheFuerstShallBeLast's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)




Comments (9)
you still haven't answered my previous comment, but anyway. i'm glad you've found others to join with you on this.
But I want to through some wrenches into the works just to see how discussion goes. This critique isn't directed at you per se, for I know you and I know your strength of character. Yet, I think a word of caution can always do us all some good.
Community is tremendous, and IMO utterly vital for adequate spiritual/religious formation...Christian or otherwise. Even so, a rhetoric of community at the expense of the individual can have equally (or potentially greater) risks as the rhetoric of the individual at the expense of the community. Group-think is a powerful phenomenon, and it is easy to lose one's own agency when plugged so heavily into a community. Such situations can foster incredibly abusive relationships and destructive ends of all sorts. One just needs to look at the many disastrous so-called "cults" of the past 50-100 years...groups forming very intentional and often radically (and positively) life-changing communities. Yet, it doesn't take much for people to lose a self-critical awareness of the self...to go along with ideals and actions they may otherwise not for the sake of being in community. In such an alienating individualistic society, the thirst for enriching community can be all encompassing...and such a desire for communion can lead people to give up far more than they ever should.
Let's not idealize...I'd venture that "community-ism" has the potential for just as much destructive behavior as "individualism." We happen to live in a (borderline) radically individualistic society, and we realize that community is something from humanity's past that functions as a foil to what we have now. I think it's great, and an increased focus on building intentional communities excites me. Yet, let's not romanticize things here. Communities throughout history have done tremendous deeds of evil...a great many of these communities doing so under the banner of Christ. In fact, the nature of a community allows it to do more harm than an individual ever could...but the capacity for doing good on a greater scale is equally there.
In otherwords, I don't think we should just think that community is going to fix all our problems. Community is a chaotic ("chaos" is not a negative word here at all!) experience of many voices and minds roiling together, and it has the potential to bring about incredibly beautiful things. I pray that this new community which you are forging blesses not only your life, but the lives of all those around you. I look forward to hearing about how this experience shapes you and your world. God bless. :)
@freethinker777 - It's here in central kentucky. We will be living with another family from the area. Plus, we're in contact with a girl from Lebanon who's moving to this area. There's also the possibility that we're going to be looking to take in a single mom/dad. the blog is www.simplycommunityky.blogspot.com
@cheapham - Hey Matt, I completely agree. I'm certainly not looking to this community to solve all our problems, but I think it will balance me - naturally orient me in the direction of considering others before myself. But, yes, I agree that community-ism (nice word by the way) is always a possibility. I think the egalitarian bend of this one, combined with it focus on including the 'other' will go a long way.
between cheapham's admonitions against cult-think and our conversation regarding student A and great satan JE... i'm sorry... i'll stop laughing....
seriously, i'm really impressed at your bravery. wow, for really real.
i love that you can't abnegation out of your head too.
I'm encouraged by this. It's something my wife and I are doing with one of our friends (and hopefully another couple).
Also, FYI, your community website doesn't have a "www" at the beginning of it; that voids the link.Sweet! Living in community is the only way to live! There's nothing like being affirmed by a four-year-old that isn't your own. True-dat!
This is random, but I think I would trace America's individualism back to Europe with the rise of modernism/modernity of which Protestant Christianity largely came from. The good news, though, is that postmodernism and postmodernity offer a way out, and I think a lot of Protestants are using it to critique their own tradition and make it less individualistic (and maybe a little more Christian in the process).
Postmodernism is a double-edged sword when it comes to Individualism. If we look at postmodern culture, I'd say it's hyper-individualistic. This neocolonial focus on consumer goods and the globalization of capitalism fosters an individualistic materialism on a grand new scale (things like the ipod are perfect examples of the heavy-individual-focus of postmodern culture).
That said, post-modernist/structualist philosophy works to break down perceived dualisms and boundaries in ways that make notions of individuality much less tenable. On this front I would agree with you, that "postmodernism" can be employed to breakdown overly individualistic paradigms and work toward a greater fluidity in our understanding of our relationships with our fellow humanity. Yet, what has manifested as postmodern culture can work in quite the opposite direction. So, just like I was saying before...let's not allow a cultural convention to be our salvation. Postmodern philosophy has some excellent things going for it, but we shouldn't buy into it so wholeheartedly that we forget to be (self-)critical.
Just food for thought. :)
@cheapham -
Yep, I accept your critique although I would be careful to distinguish between philosophical and cultural postmodernism. Globalization, I would argue, is merely the radicalization of a particular capitalistic economic system (not necessarily a philosophical postmodern phenomenon), and the same could be said concerning consumerism and materialism. I was strictly speaking about postmodernism as a philosophical enterprise, and I might even argue that postmodern culture is largely the byproduct of modernism.
Your main critique holds true, though; I placed too heavy an emphasis on philosophy. Christian theology has enough resources within its own history and tradition to combat individualism, and this should have been my ultimate appeal . . . not continental, French-school, postmodern philosophy. I intended my previous statement to come off as saying that postmodernism was a resource the church could use in combating individualism, but I definitely came off as attributing salvific status to it. Thanks for correcting me.
Peace