"There is no subject so old that something new cannot be said about it."
~Fyodor Dostoevsky

...or something old.




The Socratic Club
About this Entry
Posted by: TheSocraticClub

Visit TheSocraticClub's Xanga Site

Original: 1/9/2008 5:46 PM
Views: 65
Comments: 3
eProps: 4

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site


Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps!2 eProps! 2 eProps from:
irishmex_rebel
WindOnReed2

Wednesday, January 09, 2008
 

Yeah this is a college application essay.

Why I love Chesterton

Of the many books I have read, one of the most influential was Orthodoxy by G.K. Chesterton. The ideas that Chesterton presents in this book changed the way I perceive the universe. In Orthodoxy Chesterton defends his Christian worldview, and he does so with both wit and genius. The two ideas from this book that have most influenced my thinking are his apology of the Christian faith and his spirit of wonder about creation.

Chesterton recognized that Christianity is a rational faith and that there are a myriad of reasons to believe in it. Yet for all these reasons, the greatest and most convincing one of all is different than the rest. Chesterton writes of Christianity in his final chapter Authority and the Adventurer, “The thing has not merely told this truth or that truth, but has revealed itself as a truth-telling thing.” By this statement the large and merry journalist is saying that although every particular of Christianity cannot be proven, the religion shows itself to be true because it tells the truth. What is more, it does not merely tell the truth about some things; rather, it tells the truth about everything. At the time I read this idea it did not strike me as either particularly profound or important, but over time I began to understand both its profundity and its importance. Christianity does explain existence and it does so without error. While it took mankind until World War II to finally conclude that mankind is evil by nature, Christianity explained the sad human condition from the beginning. The philosophers searched for an accurate system of morality for thousands of years, but they need not have looked farther than Christ to find the perfect one. The world was already aged by the time Plato developed his archetypes, but if that great thinker had been acquainted with the Jewish religion in Palestine he would have discovered that the Christian God assumed the archetypes long before Plato ever thought of them. What is remarkable about Christianity is not that every its every detail can be proven, but that it explains the world perfectly. After I understood this principle I realized how indebted to Chesterton I am. With this one idea he had essentially dispelled my doubts about Christianity.

Another idea in Orthodoxy that has heavily influenced me is Chesterton’s sense of wonder. In the chapter Ethics of Elfland he writes, “Grown-up people are not strong enough to exult in monotony. But perhaps God is strong enough to exult in monotony. It is possible that God says every morning, ‘Do it again’ to the sun; and every morning, ‘Do it again’ to the moon. It may not be automatic necessity that makes all daisies alike; it may be that God makes every daisy separately, but has never got tired of making them.” This idea was revolutionary to my thinking. I had always been a child who hated monotony, who complained about boredom and who had the short attention span characteristic of all humanity. Suddenly I was able too see the world with new eyes. Chesterton taught me to “exult in monotony” and to value the smallest things in life for every created thing, no matter how obsequiously commonplace, is valuable. Chesterton showed me that everything in nature is quite unnatural. Not only is nature beautifully fantastic, but also it may not have existed at all or if it did, may have existed very differently. When I understood this I was inspired to be grateful for everything on this earth, large or small, monotonous or novel—for all is precious.

Chesterton communicated many other ingenious ideas in Orthodoxy, but these two probably left the biggest imprint on me as a person. The first idea, that Christianity is true because it tells the truth, was a major factor in dispelling my doubts about Christianity. The second idea, that the world is valuable because it is both original and precious, taught me to be grateful for everything in this world. These two ideas changed the way I understand the world and for this reason Orthodoxy has probably had a bigger influence on me than any other book.

Currently Reading
The Ecclesiastical History of the English People; The Greater Chronicle; Bede's Letter to Egbert (Oxford World's Classics)
By Bede
see related
 Posted 1/9/2008 5:46 PM - 65 views - 3 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

3 Comments

Visit irishmex_rebel's Xanga Site!

I always tell myself that I need to get into Chesterson and read his stuff, but I never start. What would you recommend?

~IM_R

Posted 1/9/2008 7:33 PM by irishmex_rebel - reply

Visit TheSocraticClub's Xanga Site!
Read "Orthodoxy" of course. "The Man Who Was Thursday" is weird and almost impossible to understand, but the parts you do understand are great. I'm trying to get into "The Everlasting Man" right now. But read "Orthodoxy" first.
Posted 1/9/2008 7:43 PM by TheSocraticClub - reply

Visit WindOnReed2's Xanga Site!
You seem to be interested mostly in apologetics right now, I guess. As long as you bury your head in that stuff, you can fool yourself for quite a long time. I used to do so myself. I was in Christian ministry, and I am familiar with ‘experiencing’ God, as well as the doubting, the hidden angst, the apologetics, and the façade. You should honor your doubt and be more honest with yourself – your brain is trying to tell you something, but you keep trying to smother it with apologetics. IF you can ever escape the Christian propaganda, you will see how obvious it is that you have never had an authentic relationship with a living Jesus or a personal Christian God. If you had, you would have known so and there'd be no doubt. But maybe you can keep up the pretense. I hope not. I realize you may dislike me intensely for saying such things, but I am blunt because I think you have potential and I think you’re limiting yourself. I don’t see evidence of a careful analysis of the Bible or history or Christian claims. Repeating the thoughts of a few apologists doesn’t count.

Also, even in your more recent post on public education, your sources do not seem widespread or balanced. Other than the Bible and the Federalist Papers, you cite three authors affiliated with the FFF or the FEE, both of which seem supported by the same circles. Your statements about religion and morality are especially off.
Posted 1/13/2008 5:23 PM by WindOnReed2 - reply


Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)



Back to TheSocraticClub's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in TheSocraticClub's local time zone:
GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)
Hit Counter
Online Schools
And if you ever get tired of this metaphysical rigmarole, read my poetry:

poetry pwns