| | Objection!
I'm glad Aaron enjoyed yesterday's entry so much that he actually wrote a counterargument to my discussion about the model minority myth's role in Asian fetishism. Of course, I love it when guys actually take the time out to dedicate a day's entry into responding to my musings...it's exactly what I want guys to do. Critical thinking and debate is a virtue of discussion...it's much better than just accepting everything as truth or simply blurting your objections with explanation. I think Aaron's got great points about the over-rationalization of sexual relationships; his perspective is oriented around subconscious or innate qualities in our persona that drives human behavior. I probably wouldn't have believe too much on biology and genetics to explain all of that, but it's one of the prevailing arguments associated with human sexual attraction.
As for my usage of the model minority myth, I think it's based on the fact that sociological explanations take into account the abilities of human beings to make choices. Therefore, it's not as strict as a biological theory, which enables people to act differently. This is why we have Asians and Pacific Islanders who can date guys in a myriad of racial preferences, physical requirements, or even the brand of hair gel that they use. Of course, the model minority myth also tackles the issue of social advantage and privilege...which I think is greatly related to dating and relationships.
Whether we like it or not, we date guys based on social advantages that might be afforded to us. The most obvious benefit that most guys want is sex...yeah, and lots of it. Another benefits might be greater access to social networks, material gains (extra birthday and Christmas presents, ahemm..), or for the pure joy of making single people jealous. The model minority myth would then state the positive perceptions of Asians and Pacific Islanders can be an incentive for gay men to date them. Conversely, it also can be used to explain why Asians and Pacific Islanders may choose to date white guys.
I remember a classic example that we used to use was for undocumented Asian young men, who would be living in the United States and venturing out for the first time onto the gay scene. Their desire to date a white guy can be motivated or predicated by the possibility of materials gains (the gold-digger stereotype) or having white partners as a status symbol (trophy boyfriends). Of course, the reverse can certainly be true in how American men may desire to date undocumented folks...the co-dependence and attention, particularly if it meant translation or provision of access to services or luxuries (can't make it without English in this country).
Clearly, whatever theory you ascribe to, it's most likely valid. I remember when I took a Making Arguments class, the professor said that writers and researchers always need to come up with more than one explanation for any given problem or issue. If you only believe that there is one cause to a social issue, then you've encountered an argument fallacy: oversimplification. So, let's just jump for joy that Aaron's provided an alternative theory. Yay! |