Monday, December 03, 2007

  • FAITH'S ADDICTION

    Currently Listening
    Radio
    By LL Cool J
    see related

    Someone once castigated me for getting an apple cider drink from Starbucks.

    “I don’t understand why you people always need to drink Starbucks,” she said.

    “What’s wrong with Starbucks?  And what do you mean by ‘us people’ and what makes you so different from us?” I asked.

    “Well, all the sugar that’s in your drink is so bad for you,” she answered matter-of-factly.

    “Does that mean that I should never eat sugar?”

    “No, natural sugar is okay, but refined sugar, like the stuff that’s in your drink, is bad for you.”

    “Why is refined sugar bad for me?”

    “It just is.  It’s man-made.  Anything man-made is bad.”

    “Why is that?  What is it about refined sugar that is so bad?  You need to tell me; otherwise I will have no reason to believe that it’s bad for me.”

    “Don’t you just know it’s not good for you?”  She was getting riled up.  “It’s because it’s fake.  It’s not real.  It’s like how organic food is better than regular food.  It’s the same concept.”

    “Okay, so can you tell me why organic food is good for you?”

    “It’s just common sense!  Everyone knows organic food is good for you!”

    “But why?”

    “Because it’s not man-made.”

    “Why is man-made stuff bad?”

    “IT JUST IS!  GEEZ.”

    “It seems like you have no idea what you’re talking about so I will tell you,” I said.  “Organic food is good for you not because ‘it just is’, and if that is your argument for it then I reject your argument.”  I paused for dramatic effect.  “It’s good for you because there are no drugs or additives or preservatives in it.  While there are drugs and preservatives that are considered safe by the FDA, it’s still better to eat food without drugs or preservatives because some of these could not only be harmful to your body, but they can be addictive as well.  Any drug is addictive, and that includes the drugs and hormones and preservatives that are pumped into meat and produce.  THAT is why organic food is good for you.  Now, as far as I know, there are no drugs or preservatives in refined sugar, and there are no drugs or preservatives in this cup of apple cider.  SO, can you please give me one good reason why refined sugar is bad for me?  And if you do, I promise I will not drink this apple cider.”

    “Whatever, Shane,” she stewed.

    “I see,” I said as I happily sipped my piping hot and delicious apple cider.

    I would later learn (from a different person) that refined sugar is bad for you because a lot of the minerals and nutrients in natural sugar are lost during the refining process.  These minerals and nutrients are beneficial to your body and they help metabolize the ingested sugar.  Because of that, refined sugar is empty calories.  (This was supposedly “obvious” information.  But how the hell should I know?  I’m not a sugar farmer.)  At the time of the Starbucks incident, I was probably being kind of an asshole by pressing the issue about the demerits of refined sugar.  This person, who considers herself to be health-conscious and has a strictly organic food diet, probably had my best interests in mind.  However, she couldn’t explain to either of us why she does what she does.

    This struck me as very odd.  I can certainly understand having strong beliefs about something, but I can’t understand having strong beliefs without basis.  I know I was educated under the discipline of science and reason, but I doubt that has anything to do with my confusion as to how people can have conviction but not understand why they do.  Behavior without reason is kind of mindless, and I have two hypotheses about it:  People who behave like this are either acting out of (a) addiction or (b) faith.

    Dictionary.com describes addiction as “the state of being enslaved to a habit or practice or to something that is psychologically or physically habit-forming, as narcotics, to such an extent that its cessation causes severe trauma.”  Everyone has some sort of addiction, and I’m certainly no exception.  I’m 100% certain that I’m a drug addict, though not in the traditional sense.  I don’t sniff blow out of a hooker’s ass crack twice a week.  I don’t hit the bong at 4:20pm every day.  I’m not a pill fiend who pops Vicodin™ every 2 hours.  I don’t smoke cigarettes habitually.  I don’t even drink alcohol to any significant extent.  (My boozing is limited to strictly special events, such as birthdays, weddings, and Saturday nights).  However, I, along with 95% of Americans, am addicted to the drugs in FDA-approved beef.  That’s why I can’t stop eating it.  While it’s possible that I can’t stop eating beef simply because I find the taste of bloody bovine carcass highly satisfying, it’s more likely that I’m addicted to the drugs that it’s laced with.  Any drug is addictive, and considering that I’ve been eating beef since I was about one-year old, I could steadfastly say that I’m a beef fiend.  While I am aware of the fact that the fat and cholesterol found naturally in beef are assaulting my heart and blood vessels, I’m also well aware that the added growth hormones and preservatives pumped into beef are slowly turning my brain into mush.  What can I say?  My name is Shane Varnet, and I’m a beef addict.

    If you consider addiction as an irrational tendency to act a certain way, then I guess it’s not that much different from blind faith.  A drug is a physical substance that is consumed and alters the body for some sort of beneficial purpose.  That could be to relieve pain (Vicodin™), or to keep you awake (speed), to be happy (Prozac™)or to be cool (Parliament™ has been scientifically proven to be 30% cooler than Marlboro™).  Regular consumption of the drug begins to alter the molecules in your body and changes it so that your body becomes physically dependent on it.  After a while you wouldn’t be taking the drug for its desired effect, but you’d be taking it because you would go loony without it.  Your conscious and logical need for the drug turns into an irrational and illogical need for it.  Dictionary.com defines faith as “a belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.”  Religious faith isn’t based on facts, it’s based on the concept of “it just is”.  If an addiction is a physical dependency manifested by irrational actions, then faith is a mental dependency manifested by illogical thought.  A drug addict will have faith that their addiction will make their life better, and a person with religious faith will be addicted to their concept of spirituality because it justifies their existence.  There is a thin line between addiction and faith, but in either case, the person loses their mind.  Addiction and faith are character flaws.

    I suppose I’ve admitted to my flaws by admitting to my addiction, and there was at least one time in my life when I consciously attempted to address this issue.  Shortly after graduating from college in 1999, I attempted to become a vegetarian.  I failed gloriously after nine days at a Black Angus in San Diego.  But, admitting to an addiction is always the first step to solving the problem.  A hardcore Christian who bases their spirituality on faith will never admit to having a mental problem.  But like a drug addict, they consume their faith without thinking about it, despite how illogical or irrational it is, because they like the way it makes them feel.  They fail to find spirituality in common sense, cognitive reasoning, and cold hard facts, and get caught up in a pseudo-spirituality that can only be described as a bad habit.  Like a drug will kill the body of a drug addict, faith will kill the mind of a cognizant human being.  Blind faith is the most dangerous drug of all-time.

    Conviction without reason is simply an addiction.  IT JUST IS.  Put that in your crack pipe and smoke it.

Comments (14)

  • john

    i try to avoid all sugar and processed carbohydrates, because i am sensitive to sugar and gain a lot of weight when i eat even reasonable amounts of it.

    i can tell by the way you write about your friend, that she isn't very attractive.  or, she's somewhat attractive but annoying enough to offset any attraction.

  • meemee925

    ha. you said "blow."

    faith as an addiction. never thought of it like that. wow, something else to add to my dislike of xtianity. thanks, phil.

  • queenofstyrofoamhearts

    "All that man-made makeup on your face is probably bad for you too."

  • od2005

    True, there are many with blind faith.  I suppose I have blind faith when I get into an airplane.  I really don't know how it works and I really don't know if it will take me to where I want and I really don't know the guys flying it, and I really don't know if it will be safe.  I suppose I should not fly again until I can get all the answers to these questions.  But I do know a little, maybe thats enough.

  • average_female

    I love irrational people.  btw I use the term "bitches" affectionately.  when i say "bitch", it's meant in a vicious tone.

  • jeanine

    A very great read. And people say that blind faith only applies to religion. Pft. She's buying into a trend of the organic and non man-made. And seriously, if my grandparents are still trotting around in their late 80's after living the man-made life in moderation, then I don't believe I'll keel over from beef and sugar. Screw her.

  • jammasterjake

    there's a certain element you don't understand about religious faith, yet you write so much about it.  should a person who hasn't studied evolution try to write about it and destroy its merits?  i'm not dichotomizing the two, i'm just making a point.  i appreciate the fact that you do think about these things.  you think more deeply than most.  however, you're looking from the outside in it seems;  you've had it described to you, but you've never experienced it.

    you make a grave error -if- you believe all people who have faith have it blindly (i'm not saying you did, but if you do, i disagree).  i have faith, yet i would hardly say it's illogical.  incompletely understood, yes, but not illogical.  you can make strong claims to atheism, but i hope you'd also agree that your belief is also incompletely understood. 

    btw i know what you mean, but drug addicts don't think "drugs will make their lives better".  most of them know the drugs are destroying them.  they just feel powerless to do anything about it. 

    very interesting post.

  • manilajones

    jammasterjake:  I really appreciate your insightful comments!

    I just wanted to clarify a point.  I'm not an atheist. I believe that God exists, but my belief isn't based on faith.  It's based on scientific hypotheses.

  • iheartthechargers

    thanks for asking . . . and i'm super tired!

  • cotton_candy_confetti

    RYC:  I would like to see how science can prove everything - it would make life so much more simple, don't you think!?!

  • ManOfThe21st

    where can i go get some drugs, huh

  • jewelee208

    eh... i don't know.  some people who behave irrationally and illogically sometimes just don't have any self-control.  or they're ruled by their emotions.  or they're crazy.  that's not necessarily an addiction, and they're not acting out of faith either.

    i have an addiction because i have faith that it will make me feel better?  it's not faith if you actually see and experience the effects taking place.  (i.e. marijuana will quell the anxiety from the after-effects of meth-amphetamines.)  it's not faith.  addiction is a dependence.  and it becomes a dependence because the body/mind KNOWS the effects and has EXPERIENCED the effects before.  that's not faith.  it's not like Christians are Christians because they've visited Heaven before and they believe in Jesus so they can experience Heaven again..

    besides that, faith is an active belief.  dependence is inactive -- it just happens.  faith comes from choice (at least as far as "choice" is possible and considered), and dependence develops.

    *and from what i hear, organic food isn't necessarily always better for you.  the freshness of a vegetable, for example, is far more important in terms of nutrients and health, than the "organicness" of it.

    and personally, i think "Conviction without reason..." is just plain DUMB.  ;)

  • nimbusthedragon

    Oh, very interesting points, all.  I'd get into it more, but you know.. I wouldn't want to see addicted to talking about stuff I have no basis arguing about since I don't think about that all that often, ho ho ho.

    but ryc: I think it's sad too.  I mean... culture these days is getting so homogenized anyway, appreciating other cultures is almost becoming a moot point, since everyone eats at mcdonald's and watches Fox, heh. But yeah.  Were you implying that I was perpetuating "perpetual foreigner syndrome", or that I was doing the opposite?

  • nimbusthedragon

    ryc: Ah, alright, that's what I thought. *cough* But yeah.  The entire post itself, to me, is sort of ridiculous, in the sense that it shouldn't even have to exist.  But I dunno.  Maybe I can change the world this way.  Or something.

    *grin*

    I don't like Starbucks just by virtue of the fact that it's taking over our Canadian Second Cup industry, lol.  (Monopoly vs monopoly... who  cares, I guess.)   but give me their refined sugar anyday.

  • Choose Identity

  • Give eProps (?)

  • New! You can now edit your comments for 15 minutes after submitting.