My Observation(s)Observation(s)
nabeelmasih
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit nabeelmasih's Xanga Site!

Country: United States
State: Texas
Metro: Dallas
Birthday: 2/19/1985
Gender: Male


Message: message meEmail: email me


Member Since: 5/21/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
pacislander4life
atheistthoughts
TheTheologiansCafe
yLiRaM
Evangelist_Guy
Servant_of_Allah
IntoMYOwn129
ProtestantWitness
xthexTruthxisxoutxtherex
JB_Fidei_Defensor
kjv_wannabe
An_Atheist_View
AskTheGodQuestion
shakens0da
Eddieray
croon_you_a_tune
CormackMcKinney
GOODGREYPOET
LSP1
formerly_elle
Slingpaw
ArgumentsFromtheLeft
Revelation_X
SoniiKuri
The_AIM_Hobo
The_Conservative_Outlook
Cobe_S
mimeboy00711
anthem815
subversive_rainbow
dosageofislam
wytehabib
Blessed_By_Allah
a0ri
pastor_matt023
questioning_islam
questioning_atheism
jbaleph
GuyFawkes
christianopinions
RationalDebate
BbMasih

Blogrings
North Hills >students of the past and the now<
previous - random - next

::Republican::
previous - random - next

..:The Republicans:..
previous - random - next

~ + ~ Desi Christians ~ + ~
previous - random - next

jesus is not religion
previous - random - next

! Christian Thinkers
previous - random - next

The North Hillians
previous - random - next

C.S. Lewis Forum
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site

Monday, November 13, 2006

The problems with withdrawing from Iraq in the current unstable climate:

 

·          Since the Iraqi armed forces are not fully able to defend themselves the terrorists and insurgents will have no problem taking full control of the country.

·          The insurgents and terrorists will claim they have defeated the United States and claim victory and cite the fact that the United States gathered up all of its troops and ran back to the United States.

·          The United States’ reputation as being the great military superpower will be blemished because of the fact it ran away from the insurgents and terrorists in Iraq.

·          And because the United States’ reputation of being the great military superpower will be blemished, other terrorist and potentially dangerous countries (such as Iran, North Korea, and China) will have the impression that the United States is nothing more than a paper tiger which will run away when faced with some resistance.  Such as they did in Mogadishu (see the movie Black Hawk Down) when the United States left Somalia when it encountered some tough military resistance.  And therefore, Iran, North Korea, and etc. will have no problem with continuing their sponsorship of terrorism more boldly because they will have nothing to fear.  The once great United States will be nothing more than a bad memory in the minds of such countries.

·          The people of Iraq will suffer the most.  They will be the ones who will have to suffer the intolerable, brutal, and sadistic regime the insurgents and terrorists will put in place after they take full control of the country (and most likely they will take full control of the country if the United States and its allies withdraw).

·          And in a regime controlled by blood-thirsty terrorists, it would be expected for other blood-thirsty terrorists to arise and take up the jihad against the kafirs (in the every non-Muslim country and in some Muslims countries).

·          And as a result, a newly refurbished terrorist regime will be born out of the ashes of the infant democracy the United States abandoned when it needed the U.S. the most.

 

There are probably more reasons why withdrawing from Iraq right now would be a terrible decision, but I cannot think of them right now because I am too lazy.


Wednesday, November 08, 2006

So the Democrats have taken over the House and made considerable gains in the Senate.  Let us just hope that the next two years the Democrats are in power are not wasted in taking revenge on the Republicans.  That would be a complete waste of time and effort and the most unproductive act the Democrats could do while in power.


Friday, November 03, 2006

What is Truth?

"What is truth?" is a very simple question.  Of course, answering it isn't so simple.  We can offer definitions like "Truth is that which conforms to reality, fact, or actuality."  But this basic definition is not complete because its definition is open to interpretation and a wide variety of applications.  What is reality?  What is fact?  What is actuality?  How does perception effect truth?  We could offer answers for each of these questions, but then we could again ask similar questions of those answers.  I am reminded of the paradox of throwing a ball against a wall.  It must get half way there, and then half way of the remaining distance, and then half of that distance, and so on. But, an infinite number of halves in this scenario never constitutes a whole.  Therefore, it would seem that the ball would never reach the wall if we applied the conceptual truths of halves. 

The ball-against-the-wall scenario simply illustrates that defining and redefining things as we try to approach a goal actually prevents us from getting to that goal.  This is what philosophy does sometimes as it seeks to examine truth.  It sometimes clouds issues so much, that nothing can be known for sure. 

But, even though it is true that an infinite number of halves (1/2 of "a" + 1/2 of the remainder + 1/2 of the remainder of that, etc.) does not equal a whole, we can "prove" that it does by simply throwing a ball at a wall and watch it bounce off.  Actually, the "1/2" equation above does not equal a whole -- mathematically.  The problem is not in the truth, but in its application as is often the case with philosophical verbal gymnastics.

"See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary principles of the world, rather than according to Christ," (Col. 2:8).

In order for truth to be defined properly, it would have to be a factually and logically correct statement.  In other words, it would have to be true.  But, perhaps we could look further look at truth by determining what it is not.  Truth is not error.  Truth is not self-contradictory.  Truth is not deception.  Of course, it could be true that someone is being deceptive, but the deception itself isn't truth.  

In relativism, all points of view are equally valid and that all truth is relative to the individual.  If this were true, then it would seem that this is the only truth relativism would have to offer.  But, the problem is that in reality, relativism isn't true for the following basic reason.  If what is true for me is that relativism is false, then is it true that relativism is false?  1) If you say no, then what is true for me is not true and relativism is false.  2) If you say yes, then relativism is false.  Relativism seems to defy the very nature of truth; namely, that truth is not self contradictory.  

Again, what is truth?

If there is such a thing as truth, then we should be able to find it.  If truth cannot be known, then it probably doesn't exist.  But, it does exist.  For example, we know that it is true that you are reading this. 

Is there such a thing as something that is always true all the time?  Yes, there is.  For example, "Something cannot bring itself into existence."  This is an absolutely true statement.  In order for something to bring itself into existence, it would have to exist in order to be able to perform an action.  But if it already existed, then it isn't possible to bring itself into existence since it already exists.  Likewise, if it does not exist then it has no ability to perform any creative action since it doesn't exist in the first place.  Therefore, "Something cannot bring itself into existence" is an absolute truth. 

The preceding example is a truth found in logic.  But, there are truths that are not logical by nature.  It is true that I love my wife.  This isn't logically provable via theorems and formulas and logic paradigms, but it is, nevertheless, true.  Therefore, we can say that truth conforms and affirms reality and/or logic. 

Is this what relativism does?  Does relativism confirm to reality and logic?  To be honest, it does to some degree.  Relatively speaking, there is no absolute right or wrong regarding which side of your head you should part your hair, if you part it at all.  To this we must concede relative "truths" that are different for different people.  But, these are relativistic by nature.  Examples of relativistic truths are, 1) people drive on the right side of the street in America and the left in England; 2) I prefer to watch science fiction over musicals; 3) snow is better than rain, etc.  These things are relative to culture, individuals, preferences, etc., and rightfully so.

If we are to ever hope to determine if there is such a thing as truth apart from cultural and personal preferences, we must acknowledge that we are then aiming to discover something greater than ourselves, something that transcends culture and individual inclinations.  To do this is to look beyond ourselves and outside of ourselves.  In essence, it means that we are looking for God.  God would be truth, the absolute and true essence of being and reality who is the author of all truth.  If you are interested in truth beyond yourself, then you must look to God.

"I am the truth"

For the Christian, the ultimate expression of truth is found in the Bible, in Jesus who said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life..." (John 14:6).  Of course, most philosophers and skeptics will dismiss His claim, but for the Christian, He is the mainstay of hope, security, and guidance.  Jesus, who walked on water, claimed to be divine, and rose from the dead, said that He was the truth and the originator of truth.  If Jesus is wrong, then we should ignore Him.  But, if He is right, then it is true that we should listen to Him.

The eyewitnesses wrote what they saw.  They were with Him.  They watched Him perform many miracles, heal the sick, calm a storm with a command, and even rise from the dead.  Either you believe or dismiss these claims.  If you dismiss them, that is your prerogative.  But, if you accept them, then you are faced with decisions to make about Jesus.  What will you believe about Him?  What will you decide about Him?  Is He true?  Is what He said true?

Truth conforms to reality.  Jesus performed many miracles and rose from the dead.

Borrowed from: http://www.carm.org/relativism/whatistruth.htm


Saturday, October 14, 2006


Friday, September 29, 2006

I like ghost stories, particularly true ones.  And if anybody else likes true ghost stories they can visit this site and read them: www.castleofspirits.com

It is a pretty good website with stories from all over the world submitted by people from all walks of life.

Enjoy.



Next 5 >>

web stats

<bgsound src="http://deathrabbit.free.fr/html/requiem1.mp3" loop="infinite">