Wednesday, June 18, 2008

• Recently, there is a "controversial film" called "City without baseball" 無野之城. The film is controversial because 1. its poster is considered "indecent":

  

  There isn't any problem with men without shirts, but the problem is: people imagine they aren't wearing any trousers.

  The second controversy is too much nudity is pictured in the changing room, ie this is not a film about baseball but a homoerotic film. In short, it's selling dog's meat in disguise of a goat's head.

  The third controversy is the baseball player-and-actor said that he isn't gay and if any gays express interest in him, he'd beat him up.

  Honestly, I am not interested in this film, because: 1. they don't appeal to me. 2. I am fed up that if naked men are featured in a film, it is considered to be targeting gay audience. I don't think that gays are as superficial as that, at least I am not. And, I can download tons of gay porns in one click. I don't mind the director or distributor using naked men as gimmicks or as a commercial element, like in "Lust, Caution", you can say that the sex scenes are a way to attract audience, but at the end, it is the quality and the script of the film that count.

  To that homophobic baseball player, I can find an atheletic who is 100% sexier than you and not afraid to be an object of (homo)sexual-fantasy:

  

  • 12:20 AM
  • 21 views
  • 27 eprops
  • 15 comments