Weblog
Thursday, May 15, 2008
-

Currently Watching
When Harry Met Sally...
see related"Men and Women Can't Be Friends"
Since I'm busy lately, an old post (with mods) gets the ol' bump up.
So I have come to the conclusion that it is difficult, if not impossible, for men and women to be friends. Because the sex gets in the way. Not actual having sex, of course. But at least one party is always thinking about it – and it’s not always the man.
My few male friends (all straight) are all distant friends. I can’t get close with any of them, and I am wondering if it’s because of the fact that the relationship is platonic. Does that compel them to have an arms-length friendship? It appears so. For years, my best friend was a male. But we were also in a relationship. When that ended, it seems I lost my best friend.
I've seen post after post by men complaining about being put in the "friend zone". I've also seen posts about men who seem to use friendship as a cover in order to get some sort of sexual experience or relationship out of the person.
On the flip side, many of the women I know who have male friends usually have at least a low-grade physical or sexual attraction to their friends.
It would be nice to have a platonic friendship with a man. I would like to get to befriend and appreciate men without the prospect of sex hanging over our heads. I don’t want to be hopping into bed with my buds a la Friends.
But I am starting to think that when a man and a woman are involved, it is truly impossible to have a true friendship with the opposite sex without it ever entering into sexual terrain. What do you think? Can men and women really be friends?
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
-
I'll Smile When I Want To
Don't tell me to smile.
I have a youthful appearance and I look years younger than I am. Maybe that is why people think they are telling the little girl to smile. "Come on, smile".
Don't do that. Not even to little girls. It's condescending and annoying. And why exactly would the girl be smiling? To make you feel better. Not because she wants to.
I don't walk around with a smile on my face and I don't like to smile when I have no reason to do it. You know why that is? Because I was a shy, insecure, introverted child, and I used to walk around smiling all the time. It was not always because I was so happy inside. In fact, I often smiled when I was not. I often smiled when I was nervous or intimidated or afraid. After I grew up, I found out that in the animal kingdom, smiling is not an expression of happiness or joy but of submission. So it is with us humans.
My smile was all too often a grimace of submission, and I grew to hate the sight of it. I don't even like the way my face looks when I smile too broadly. I look like a submissive chipmunk.
Some of my most regretted moments happened when I froze up and got a big cheesy, nervous smile on my face instead of standing up for myself or telling off whomever needed telling off at the moment. After the last such moment a few years ago, I made a decision that I would work hard not to smile if I really didn't feel like smiling. Although when someone asks me to smile, I will do it to placate them. But I made another decision today.
I will save my smiles for when they are real. If someone asks me to smile and I feel like smiling, I will do it. But if I am sad, or angry, or nervous, then I will refuse. From now on I smile for myself. Not for anyone else.
Monday, May 12, 2008
-
Despite Article. Still on the Fence
Can someone out there do a post (or leave a comment
) about what's good about McCain? Now I don't mean what's horrible and evil about Obama or Clinton. And I don't want to hear "I'm voting for McCain because Obama and Clinton are so evil", etc. Let's forget those two for a minute. If you support and will vote for McCain, why? Any args in his favor? What is there about him that I don't know and may want to learn? This voter is up for grabs. I invite you to win me over.
PS. This is not a debate, I'm not interested in, nor do I have much time for, going into lengthy debates on my blog right now. Rather, I'm here to question and learn. So ok, shoot. -
Looking Beyond The Same Three Issues
From The Seattle Times:Young, evangelical ... for Obama?
Seattle Times staff reporter
Michael Dudley is the son of a preacher man.
He's a born-again Christian with two family members in the military. He grew up in the Bible Belt, where almost everyone he knew was Republican. But this fall, he's breaking a handful of stereotypes: He plans to vote for Democrat Barack Obama.
"I think a lot of Christians are having trouble getting behind everything the Republicans stand for," said Dudley, 20, a sophomore at Seattle Pacific University.
Dudley's disenchantment with the GOP isn't unique among young, devoutly Christian voters. According to a September 2007 survey by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, 15 percent of white evangelicals between 18 and 29, a group traditionally a shoo-in for the GOP, say they no longer identify with the Republican Party. Older evangelicals are also questioning their traditional allegiance, but not at the same rate.
But, Howard Dean, don't count your chickens quite yet. College-age and 20-something Christians may be leaving the GOP, but only 5 percent of young evangelicals have joined the Democrats, according to the Pew survey. The other 10 percent are wandering the political wilderness, somewhere between "independent" and "unaffiliated."
Shane Claiborne, a Philadelphia Christian activist and author of "Jesus for President: Politics for Ordinary Radicals," has a different name for these folks: "political misfits."
Claiborne has traveled around the country the past several years, speaking and preaching mostly to college-age Christians who are "both socially conservative and globally aware." That makes them disenchanted with both major parties, he said.
"It's not about liberal or conservative, or Democrats or Republicans," he said. "I don't think it's a new evangelical left. ... There's a new evangelical stuck-in-the-middle."
UW communications professor David Domke said some young evangelicals are breaking with the GOP for the same reasons many people broke from the party in the 2006 legislative elections — the unpopular war in Iraq; the Bush administration's abysmal approval ratings; or, now, because of the tanking economy.
Others broke from the party when John McCain, who hasn't held much appeal for evangelicals in the past, became the presumptive nominee.
The Arizona senator hasn't been a consistent foe of gay marriage, and he supports federally funded embryonic stem-cell research. James Dobson, head of the conservative Christian group Focus on the Family, announced in February that if McCain was the GOP nominee, he'd sit out the election.
But students at a recent bipartisan political union meeting at SPU say there's something more going on with young Christians than disenchantment with McCain.
In an informal poll of the political union, the majority supported Obama.
"I think it's a new movement starting," said Amy Archibald, 19, a sophomore at the evangelical school. "Most of us would never blindly follow the old Christian Right anymore. James Dobson has nothing to do with us. A lot of us are taking apart the issues, and thinking, 'OK, well, [none of the candidates] fits what I'm looking for exactly.' But if you're going to vote, you've got to take your pros with your cons."
Eugene Cho, a founder and lead pastor at Seattle's Quest Church, which caters to a predominantly under-35 crowd, urges young Christians to look beyond the two or three issues that have allowed Christians to be "manipulated by those that know the game or use it as their sole agenda."
"While the issue of abortion — the sanctity of life — must always be a hugely important issue, we must juxtapose that with other issues that are also very important," Cho wrote in his blog on faith and politics.
Polls have shown that young Christians aren't any less concerned about the "family values" issues that have traditionally driven Christians to the Republican camp. (In fact, a study by the Barna Group, an evangelical polling organization, shows young Christians are actually more conservative on abortion than their elders.) It's just that they're also concerned about issues such as social justice and immigration, issues traditionally associated with Democrats.
Judy Naegeli, 25, who works at a Christian philanthropy, says easy access to information about the world via social-networking sites, YouTube and blogs is the reason her generation is more concerned with social justice.
"It's changed our perspective. ... Each generation chooses their cause, and ours is AIDs in Africa, or poverty or social justice," she said.
Tyler Braun, 23, a Portland seminary student who opposes abortion and gay rights, said he'll probably vote for Obama because, since he'd would like to see U.S. troops leave Iraq.
Anika Smith, 23, who works for a think tank in Seattle, said she's concerned with the same issues, but she plans to vote for McCain:
"I'm worried about the war and the economy and social-justice issues. But, the abortion issue is still nonnegotiable."
Nathan Johnson, the executive director of the King County Republican Party, says he is skeptical that young, socially conservative Christians will desert the GOP this fall.
He agrees young Christians appear to be looking beyond the two or three issues — abortion, gay rights, stem-cell research — that have made Christian voters loyal in the past. "But that doesn't mean they're no longer Republican.
"Once the primary is over, and we get into a head-to-head contest, Obama's voting record will come to light," said Johnson, 24. "Then there will be a lot of young conservative voters who won't be able to tolerate what he's stood for in terms of abortion and other socially conservative values."
Young evangelicals are more of a swing constituency than they've been for decades, said Andy Crouch, an editor at Christianity Today, a national evangelical magazine.
"This could turn out to be the election where both parties realize that the evangelical vote is so hopelessly split down the middle that it's not worth courting them at all because what parties need are blocs that can be appealed to en masse," Crouch said. "Paradoxically, evangelicals would become less relevant than ever before."
Braun, the seminary student, said he's not totally committed to any candidate yet.
"I just keep thinking, if Jesus were alive now, he wouldn't necessarily be voting Republican," he said.







True
Lifetime